Simple definition can be technically sound person who can write for the targeted audience. During the early stage of my career, I was in the impression that anybody who can write can be a “technical writer”.
According to me, a writer should have the following qualities:
- good observation/analytical/patience skills; understand the pattern of the work; this differs from one organization to other.
- learn and unlearn the standards; a standard that you might have learned now, would not be a standard at a later point.
- think and write from the perspective of the end user.
- good researching skills, if it mean just googling and finding definition too.
- excellent editing skills, should be able to translate the technical terms to a language that the end user understands.
- detail oriented work culture.
- should ask questions to the right people at the right time, not just interviewing skills.
- [Nithin] more to be added when I can
Finally, the challenge part! a technical writer should be ready to face any change in his work, whether it is schedule change or scope change. My argument is most of the time, you do not create content, you either edit/re-write the content from the input provided to you over multiple communication channels (emails, phone, face to face and so on)
